Archive for September, 2006

Sir Reg Empey’s speech to the 2006 Labour Party Conference

Saturday, September 30th, 2006


Following Tony Blair’s announcement that this was to be his last Party Conference as Labour Leader and Prime Minister there has been an understandable clamour by senior figures for positions of power.

I would be worried that an internal Labour Party bloodbath could distract minds and attention from resolving once and for all the blockages standing in the way of a return to devolution in Northern Ireland.

Being openly selfish about this from a Northern Ireland point of view, the Leader of the Labour Party is also the leader of our nation. As we are moving to the most critical two months in a process that has lasted over ten years, you will forgive me for pointing out that any distractions created by internal party problems will mean that the Prime Minister and the Secretary of State will have other things on their minds when we go to Scotland next month.

My party has been through this cycle before. It wasn’t good for us and it won’t be good for you. I would ask that circumstances are created that ensure that both men are able to be totally focused on the task ahead in October, and we create the best possible atmosphere for a positive outcome. While I know that party matters are unavoidable and inevitable, we must appreciate that the country still has to be run and clear directions given by Ministers.

With the largest unionist Party and Sinn Fein trying to dribble the ball for as long as possible for internal party political reasons, unless a real, dedicated, focused push from the Prime Minister and Secretary of State is forthcoming we will be squandering the years of effort, blood, sweat and tears, that my party and others have invested since 1996 and indeed before.

We would also be squandering the opportunity to re-establish a devolved Assembly and Executive and ensure that Northern Ireland, like our Scottish and Welsh counterparts within the union, have local decision makers making local decisions.

I know that there has been a debate in Westminster about the right of Scottish MPs to determine the outcome of English legislation. I had to choose my words carefully considering the prominent position of one particular Scottish MP who currently controls the purse strings, nonetheless if this current scenario sticks in the throat of some English voters, I would ask you to consider this:

Imagine having politicians that you didn’t elect making up policy and using you as guinea pigs for unpopular reforms across the policy spectrum: from introducing higher rates to changing your leader-in-its field education system to name but two. You wouldn’t like it would you?

Well this scenario is what the people of Northern Ireland have to live with under Direct Rule. Some of this is self inflicted, but most of it can be traced to how this government has chosen to manage the process. Nobody can argue that there has not been a level of commitment shown to us in Northern Ireland unlike any shown in the recent past by the Prime Minister, however the implementation and holding to account of the commitments given by some parties has not been what it should have been.

Because of this lack of holding to account, the Secretary of State should understand the scepticism that has existed about the 24th November deadline. Never before in this process has any deadline been kept; look at decommissioning for example.

The UUP believes, however, that despite the past, now is the time to decide whether or not it is possible to re-establish Stormont. We have had long enough, over 10 years, and we will make our decision when we see everything that is on the table.

But the Secretary of State has left the back door open with the ongoing existence of the 2003 Assembly to May 2007, creating the opportunity for people to procrastinate at St Andrews, and delude themselves that perhaps what they will not do in November, they will be able to do in the spring.

This very thinking is what led us to suspension when the republican movement thought it could play the long game. That, and government turning a blind eye to Sinn Fein’s activities, led to the present suspension, and the same thinking will lead to failure again.

That’s why I repeat the importance of getting it right this time. This could be our last chance for a generation.

Donaldson address Strangford Gathering

Saturday, September 30th, 2006


On Friday night last, Party Officer responsible for Youth Development, membership and Recruitment Kenny Donbaldson was a guest speaker at Strangford Constituency Association’s Annual dinner.

Extracts of Kenny’s speech:

“As a native of Crossmaglen, South Armagh it will come as no shock to you that this is the first occasion I have spoken at a gathering of Ulster Unionists within the Strangford Constituency. I’m afraid I have been guilty in the past of not acquainting myself with the challenges and opportunities faced by Unionists in the East and North of our Province but have instead allowed myself to occasionally behave in a self-indulgent way towards what the craic is for Unionists who live as a minority community in the south and west of our Province.

“Too often, many of us have concentrated upon our own immediate backyard and haven’t shown a willingness to learn what the varying experiences of our Unionist colleagues elsewhere in this Province are. I believe it is imperative for us, if we are to move forward as a Party to cast aside this cultural mindset, perhaps better described as a; debilitating parochial shackle!

“Life for Unionists in Strangford is very different to life for Unionists in South Armagh. In Strangford Ulster Unionism’s principle opponent is the DUP. In my neck of the woods, our principle opponent is Sinn Fein, its’ parents, the Provisional IRA and the hawks in the dissident republican factions.

“In Strangford the growth of the economy and its associated outworkings is arguably the principle issue for local unionist inhabitants. In South Armagh, the priority for Unionism is survival and a wish to be tolerated as valued neighbours by the majority nationalist/republican community.

“Despite the different lives we lead, there are undoubtedly collective unifying aims and objectives which we, as Ulster Unionists all share; our wish to remain as part of the Union of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, to see this Union promoted and strengthened, to see Northern Ireland stand on its own two feet and become a political entity which is considered successful both locally and Internationally, our wish to see the violence and paramilitarism which has marred our past to be once and for all consigned to the dustbin of history, our wish to see our young people progress in life educationally, to create the circumstances whereby our young people wish to settle in Northern Ireland, work and raise their families as opposed to leaving us for the perceived “greener pastures of Mainland UK.”

“We, as Ulster Unionists want the same things, we want a society which is at ease with itself, which cherishes, instead of regrets the fact that we are so culturally diverse.

“The good news story of our increased membership should be publicized by our Party throughout the media and the Province in counteraction of the defections of “so-called Ulster Unionists” to the Tory Party. As someone who lives as a Unionist in Crossmaglen I simply cannot fathom the rationale of individuals such as Peter Bowles, James Leslie and your own Bob Lyttle. Regardless of these individuals’ frustrations as to how local politics here has become semi-paralysed, they should understand that their actions have served only one purpose, to divide Unionism further, promote disenchantment within that community and weaken that community’s efforts at instilling a sense of cohesion within it.

“Many of you here tonight will have stronger memories than me of what the Tory Party has done for Unionism and this Province. Remember the nightmare year 1985 when the Tory Party began the process of selling Unionism down the river through the Anglo-Irish Agreement? History has proven time and time again that the Conservative Party are incapable of doing in Government for Unionism what they purport to support when in opposition. I accept and regret the fact that the UUP have become marginalized from the greater politics of our Nation in recent times but I cannot and do not support the reckless movement of “so-called Unionists” to the non-entity that is the Northern Ireland Conservatives Movement.

“Rather I believe that we, as a Party should be striking up relationships with Mainland opinion through the parameters of our own Party vision. Only this morning, I met with our Party Leader, Sir Reg to discuss an idea, which I hope to develop in the coming weeks of Unionist outreach with Political Schools and Societies based in mainland UK Universities.

“Ulster Unionism needs to get its’ message out to a wider audience; we need to court local, National and International support. Without our movement there would be no Northern Ireland, we won the right to call this part of our Island, Northern Ireland and a Constituent Province of the United Kingdom. It is us who have fought throughout our history to bring about peace and cohesiveness within and between our communities. It is us, who sacrificed our electoral supremacy in exchange for the better good of our Country, it us who continue to provide responsible political leadership to all the people of Northern Ireland. We may not be the lead electoral voice within Unionism, but our words our based upon the principles of equity, diversity and interdependence between our people. Our words and actions are not exclusively motivated and are not designed to augment sectarian rivalries.

“We offer the best hope for the future of this Province, we have a vision which accommodates our diverse peoples, and it is that vision which each of us must evangelize out there in wider society.”

Speaking of further initiatives, which have taken place under the remit of the Youth Development portfolio, Kenny added:

“Over the course of the Summer, a series of training seminars were held which gave younger members a good grounding in the principles of PR, interacting with the public - canvassing, political campaigning etc.

“As the new Young Unionists build centrally, it is incumbent upon all of us to work towards establishing Youth Branches in Constituencies across this Province. It is imperative that young people are also recruited and integrated into their local Branches and Constituency Association.

“I look around the room and the story is similar to Ulster Unionist get-togethers throughout the Province, there is an absence of younger folk under 45 years of age. If we do not redress this cycle at local level, our Party frankly cannot continue indefinitely. We must therefore increase our appeal to a broader range of the electorate – one initiative I will be taking forward in the coming weeks is that of; establishing a research team under the Youth Development portfolio who will be charged with developing ideas and formulating policy in areas which specifically concern our young people – getting on the Property ladder, youth suicide, motor insurance, financing Higher Education, combating the scourge of drugs and the opportunists who seek to imprison our young people through addiction.

“I say to you here tonight that a Northern Ireland without a strong, unified and visionary Ulster Unionist Movement would be an extremely bleak place. Those of us involved in Ulster Unionism should realize that we hold the key to the future of this Country, we can either; be self-indulgent, cry about all those who’ve betrayed us, done us wrong and stolen our clothes or we can take control of our own destiny and make this beautiful Country of ours work for the betterment of all the Northern Ireland community,” concluded Mr Donaldson.

Investment in Science Teaching & Research essential for a competitive economy - Robinson

Friday, September 29th, 2006

Ulster Unionist Employment and Learning Spokesperson Ken Robinson MLA, has today met with Dr Peter Cotgreave, the Director of the London-based think-tank the Campaign for Science and Engineering (CaSE).

CaSE represents the views of the UK science community and is a key influence in political debate throughout the UK on the place of the sciences. In August this year, CaSE produced a report on the teaching of sciences in Northern Ireland schools, showing both strengths and weaknesses.

In a statement, Mr Robinson said: “If Northern Ireland is to have a knowledge-based regional economy capable of competing in the global market - and securing quality jobs for the people of Northern Ireland - investment in science teaching and scientific research is absolutely essential. The recent CaSE report has highlighted actions that must be taken to ensure that existing strengths are secured and built upon.

“CaSE has also drawn attention to the commitment to science teaching and research by the devolved administrations in Scotland and Wales. In particular, the decision by Scotland to appoint a Chief Scientific Advisor - a move now also recommended by the Welsh Assembly - provides a concrete example of a policy initiative that can focus political and public attention on the economic significance of science teaching and research.

“There is much that is positive regarding the sciences in Northern Ireland - not least the commitment and motivation of our science teachers, and the strong research record of our two excellent universities. However, Northern Ireland is at the bottom of the UK league table in terms of our investment in science research. If we want to see our economy grow and compete, this needs to be addressed.

“Investment in science teaching and research has the potential to deliver economic and social benefits for Northern Ireland.  It cannot be an optional extra for our economy.  Leadership from a devolved administration in Northern Ireland could enable all of us to gain from a new appreciation of the economic importance of science teaching and research.”

Slashing of Policing Districts suits SF agenda - Hatch

Friday, September 29th, 2006

The recent report by the oversight commissioner stating that the slashing of the number of Policing Districts from 29 to 8 under the review of public administration would cause problems of service delivery as envisaged by Patten, vindicates the stance taken by all the political parties except Sinn Fein, Alderman Arnold Hatch Ulster Unionist Vice-President of the Northern Ireland Local Government Association said today.

In a statement Mr Hatch said,

“The 7 council model would mean large remote and weak local government where local communities would be further isolated from the decision making bodies.

It is time the Policing Board questioned the ‘lap dog’ approach of the Chief Constable who has not, I believe, realised the implications of only 8 District Command Units to cover Northern Ireland.

It will be difficult to keep close to local communities without creating another tier of bureaucracy within policing.

I can see quite clearly why the at least the Sinn Fein Leadership has opted for the 7 council model because it will make it more difficult for the PSNI to keep law and order.”

UUP Sports Spokesman commends Derry City FC after Brave Performance in Paris

Friday, September 29th, 2006

UUP Sports Spokesperson Trevor Ringland today congratulated Derry City FC on their brave performance last night against top French club Paris St. Germain.

“I want to congratulate the players and fans of Derry City football club on doing us all proud last night”, said Mr Ringland. “Whilst at the end of the day the result was disappointing, the Derry players put in a very creditable performance against an elite European football team. This was the closest a club from either Irish football league has ever come to participating in the group stages of European competition”.

“In particular, I would like to commend Derry City’s fans for their enthusiasm, and for being such superb ambassadors for their city. People across the Province can learn a great deal from their positivity. Derry’s fans showed all of us the true positive character of people here and it’s to all of our shame that we often can’t show such a constructive attitude at home to each other.

The people of the Maiden City can feel proud of their team’s achievements this season in Europe - all of us can only hope that the best from Stephen Kenny’s team is yet to come”.

Armstrong: Hain puts pressure on Unionists and not Sinn Fein

Friday, September 29th, 2006

Ulster Unionist Assembly Member for Mid Ulster, Billy Armstrong MLA in the wake of a meeting with the Secretary of State, Peter Hain MP on 28 September 2006 has said that throughout the meeting the whole thrust of Peter Hain’s argument for the return of Devolution at Stormont was that it was for Unionists to compromise and Sinn Fein not being pressurised to do anything. He gave the impression throughout that it was only the Unionists that had to move

Billy said: “The Westminster Government would be prepared to accept Sinn Fein in a NI Executive today, irrespective of its undemocratic position with regards to the police and the rule of law and order. The criminal empires are still in existence and will continue, long after the 24 November deadline. This must be the only country in the world where a political party, does not support the police service, can have a seat in Government. By failing to confront the main obstacle to the return of a devolved administration, namely the Republican Movement’s failure to abandon criminality once and for all, Peter Hain has effectively handed them a veto over political progress

The Westminster Government is continuing in its failure to respect the Unionist position but the difference now, is that Unionists must get it right because the Westminster government has closed all exits, which had previously remained open to the advantage of the Ulster Unionist Party.

There is a complete lack of trust in the Unionist community of Sinn Fein and still no arrests following the 20 December 2004, Northern Bank robbery of £26m and murder of Robert Mc Cartney in 2005 which was then followed by murder of Denis Donaldson in April 2006 and all these have links to the IRA. These events are being air brushed out of history by the Westminster Government and no one to be held accountable. I have no reason to suppose, should a deal be struck between DUP and Sinn Fein in the coming weeks that similar incidents would not occur. What proof does government require to make them realise that Sinn Fein still has structures in place and the personnel to carry out similar attacks in the future?

Devolution is the only way we will be able to alleviate some of the worst effects of disastrous policies on rates, education, health service, water rates, economic growth and reduction of District Councils. It is time that DUP and Sinn Fein thrashed out their differences.”

Empey poses questions over value of Scotland talks after DUP Chairman’s “Absolutist” Position

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

UUP Leader Sir Reg Empey today raised serious questions about the point in going to talks in Scotland after a senior DUP figure appeared to categorically rule out any deal being done, no matter what the circumstances, by November 24th.

Lord Morrow appeared to rule out any deal being done by November 24th in comments at an Assembly Meeting in Stormont on Tuesday. The Hansard records Lord Morrow as having said, “…anyone who is holding their breath for 24 November can forget about it. I state clearly: those people can forget about 24 November because nothing will happen.”

Sir Reg said this was a new line from the DUP chairman and at loggerheads with today’s comment by Ian Paisley who said that any deal done by November 24th would have to be put to the people.

In a statement Sir Reg said,

“The DUP Chairman has ruled out, quite emphatically, any progress by the November 24 deadline. The Secretary of State re-iterated the seriousness of the government deadline today and yesterday in the Dail, Bertie Ahern, in a statement, said that post November 24th the Irish government was keen to press on with Plan B and increased North-South activity and influence in Northern Ireland.

Unionism does not react well to blackmail or threats and all of this from both governments could of course be hard-balling. Having said that it seems the DUP have once again shifted position if the DUP Chairman’s comments are anything to go by.

If the DUP has decided it is not going to do the business, under any circumstances, by November 24th, the question has to be asked what is the purpose of the talks in Scotland? Will a genuine effort be made to reach a breakthrough or will it be a case of just going through the motions?

There is no clearly defined DUP position on its attitude to the November 24th deadline. Are we to believe the Deputy Leader and his more reasonable position? The Party Leader and his slightly more hardline position? Or the absolutist position of the Party Chairman?

If the DUP have made their mind up as Lord Morrow says they have, then the public should be told the reasons why and the governments should not waste an estimated £500,000 taxpayers money on an elaborate PR stunt in St Andrews.

It seems that Lord Morrow is rushing forward to embrace failure on behalf of Unionism, potentially handing a propaganda victory to Sinn Fein.”

John Andrews: “A New Vision for Unionism”

Thursday, September 28th, 2006



Reg Empey is pioneering radical change in our party following the end of the formal link to the Orange Order.He has followed up this break with traditional Unionism with brave statements in his interview last June in Irish News recognizing that Unionism in general must come to terms with its past and recognize that over the last 35 years Unionist rhetoric from both Unionist parties has been on occasion negative, divisive and in certain cases encouraging violence and sectarian hatred.This big gesture shows a more tolerant and pluralist vision;History shows us UUP has proved it can work with nationalism to make NI work.

Even Sinn Fein are now realizing we have a fairer, more tolerant,more meritocratic and more open and transparent society here than in the Republic,but what is missing is accountable democracy.While the Republic undoubtedly has become more secular and multicultural ,the Celtic tiger has also created a deprived underclass whose votes Sinn Fein have successfully targetted. It is with this vision of a fairer,inclusive and more meritocratic society that we must reach out as a party to pro Union Catholics who can benefit equally from the social ,welfare and public service provisions of the United Kingdom.For this reason we have changed our values and objectives clause in our party rules to espouse the need to promote and strengthen the Union rather than just maintain it.

The Union has been strengthened as a result of the vision and decisions taken by UUP in 1998.The benefits are now clearly seen as illustrated in the recent ‘Life and Times’ survey commissioned by the Electoral commission and carried out by the two Universities which shows more Catholics accepting that the Union remains the only practical constitutional arrangement for the foreseeable future.The results show 32%of Catholics now recognizing the Union as an acceptable way forward and wanting to stay within the Union(previous survey 25%)This clearly illustrates the Union is now more secure .

We also see the two governments now recognizing the Union as the only practical way forward for Northern Ireland.We no longer have Irish governments playing the green card as in the days of Haughey or the Labour Party in Britain flirting with Irish unity.The Irish political parties are now justifiably concerned at the threat of Sinn Fein with their criminality and growing power base which has found succour in growing social and economic inequalities.The conclusion of the ‘Life and Times’ survey clearly illustrates that the Union is secure as noted by The Sunday Times 10 July,’partition is unlikely to be abandoned within the present generation and that even among Catholics a majority would not abolish the border……all the signs in the survey suggest Northern Ireland is stabilizing under direct rule from Britain with Irish government input’ .We see Sinn Fein accepting a partitionist settlement as the only practical way forward and while they talk of unity by 2016 they realize Northern Ireland is now a more fair,meritocratic,multicultural tolerant society.

UUP took risks electorally and it has taken time to reap the rewards, Northern Ireland is stabilizing under the Union with Irish government input and this appears be an acceptable way forward for both communities.

Similarly while many in UUP are wrestling with our consciences over the link with PUP,this may not be electorally popular in the short term but in the longer term this vision again shows UUP taking risks for the benefit of all communities in Northern Ireland.We can not ignore these deprived loyalist areas and have an obligation within Unionism to reach out to bring them in from the cold.Improving standards and aspirations in these communities depends on making NI work and giving jobs and prosperity to all.Too often DUP rhetoric espouses the opposite as it remains in their and Sinn Fein’s electoral interests to perpetuate polarization through the politics of fear.Only the UUP can offer the politics of progress and can work for a Northern Ireland that works and is united and at ease with itself through a truly tolerant and inclusive society.

Our new values and objectives also emphasize the UUP as a party that promotes a tolerant and inclusive society where individuals have equal rights to welfare,education and health benefits regardless of race,gender or creed,this is an essential basis towards creating a truly secular and fair society.

It is to be welcomed that the DUP are finally engaging in the assembly committee set up to restore devolution,it is notable now that recent Sinn Fein statements are showing the party getting cold feet as devolution suddenly is being talked up after the summer’s work.But we in Unionism must be careful DUP walked away before when a deal was near in 2003 with the ’sackcloth and ashes’ speech which scuppered those talks.The truth is DUP are so uncertain and split about where to go they are paralysed into inaction and run for cover everytime they are pushed.What of their new agreement?While we see progress in Stormont,the proposals are basically just a repackage with tweaking of the Belfast agreement and if there is no agreement all that is on offer is more increasingly hard nosed direct rule with joint stewardship the new buzz word government speak for a watered down version of joint authority.We are now faced with unpopular decisions imposed by Blair to blackmail us into devolution on education,RPA,rates ,water rates and even a threatened police precept charge.The big prize is Sinn Fein acceptance of Police which will be lost if the DUP fail to engage seriously .We will then be consigned to joint stewardship ,with continued north south bodies as each deal on offer gets worse for Unionism.We in the UUP are engaging seriously and will work with DUP where possible to ensure the best deal for Unionism.We will continue to reach out confidently and represent Unionism to promote the Union and make Northern Ireland work within the Union for the benefit of all its citizens

Meanwhile the biggest single issue facing the majority of voters is increasing levels of crime,with vandalisim,petty burglery and antisocial behaviour which have all become a recreation.Until we get a grip with the real problems in deprived areas through our own tailor made policies for tackling these real issues these problems will only increase.There are signs that society is breaking down partly due to breakdown in traditional family structures which are leading to an increasingly lawless society.

UUP’ ‘lets get real’ campaign projects radical family friendly policies to encourage the family,with childcare provision and implementation of the proposals of the Hart report to provide counselling support at an early stage to prevent family break-ups.

Sectarianism ( and increasingly racism) are now endemic within our society and perhaps the most serious problem facing our community and must be tackled with politicians taking a lead.Children born after the troubles are now entrenched in sectarian division.It is time for all politicians to act as shown by the example in Scotland where the new devolved executive have made defeat of sectarianism a priority.Too often our politicians simply stoke up fear to perpetuate polarization for their own gain,with rejectionist negative Unionism enjoying the opportunity to use emotive arguments to inflame division and thus destroy any progressive ideas emanating from Unionism.Until we recognize that maintaining the Union means making Northern Ireland work we our consigning our children to under-achievement,poverty and crime in a stagnant economy and especially in the deprived loyalist communities.It is only the UUP that has worked and delivered that can make Northern Ireland work within the Union.

UUP MEP tells Commissioner that action is needed now to avoid Potential Catastrophe in NI Dairy Sector

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

Ulster Unionist MEP Jim Nicholson has taken his campaign to highlight the problems facing the dairy industry in Northern Ireland to the European Commission today where Mr Nicholson met with the EU agriculture Commissioner Mariann Fischer Boel in Strasbourg.

Mr Nicholson was accompanied to the meeting by Conservative Agriculture Spokesperson in the European Parliament, Neil Parish MEP, Scottish Conservative MEP Struan Stevenson and Fine Gael MEP Mairead McGuiness.

Mr Nicholson urged the Commissioner to increase the export refunds for dairy products that were reduced by the European Commission in anticipation of a deal being struck at this summer’s crunch World Trade Organisation talks. The substantial cut in export refunds caused dairy farmers and processors to incur significant losses.

Speaking after the meeting Mr Nicholson said,

“We had a very useful and constructive meeting with the Commissioner who agreed with me that there is a great disparity in the price being received by dairy farmers throughout the EU with the UK being the worst. Our farmers receive over 11% less than the average price throughout the EU.

“I impressed upon the Commissioner that action was needed now to avoid a potential catastrophe in Northern Ireland’s dairy industry. There is a real need now, while negotiations at the WTO are stalled, for the dairy industry to restructure and become more competitive in preparation for any future agreement at the WTO talks.

“Agriculture has become the sticky point in the negotiations but I believe, to a large extent, that a deal is inevitable in the medium to long term and we all know that it is Northern Ireland’s farmers who will feel the pain the most.

“I am disappointed because I am not convinced that the full extent of the problems facing our dairy sector are realised and understood in Brussels. While there is a possibility that some co financing of support for restructuring the industry may be available from Europe, it will have to be led by the UK Government.

“Nevertheless I am committed to doing all I can to raise awareness of the problems facing the Province’s dairy sector and will continue to raise awareness and gain support from other areas of Europe.”

UUP shines a light into “Mission Creep” of North/South Bodies

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

Ulster Unionists have launched ‘North South Watch’ – a regular monitor of developments which shines a light on what has been “gradual mission creep” of North South Bodies in recent months.

The Party has asked South Antrim MLA Jim Wilson to join Esmond Birnie’s team to oversee the initiative and updates of this work will soon be available on the UUP website (www.uup.org).

A comprehensive report has been compiled detailing some of the more worrying aspects of North Southery. For example:

In December 19 2005, the Northern Ireland Office announced an extension of terms of appointment to North/South Body boards (Foyle, Carlingford & Irish Lights Commission; North/South Language Body; Intertrade Ireland; The Food Safety Promotion Board and; Tourism Ireland.

On May 2nd 2006, a Joint Communiqué from the British-Irish Intergovernmental Conference stated that matters under discussion were: security situation and continuing cooperation between PSNI and An Garda Siochána; a range of issues in relation to Policing, Parades, Loyalism, Inquiries (Hamill, Wright, Nelson, Finucane); human rights and equality; and North/South matters including the Northwest region, Northwest Gateway Initiative, Derry/Letterkenny Gateway and the 4 local council areas of Derry, Strabane, Limavady and Donegal.

On September 8 2006, Dermot Ahern told the British-Irish Association that “there will be a step change in North-South cooperation… We have agreed on this and are prepared to give practical expression to it.” He went on to say that “we will look at health, education and other public services in border areas and on an all-island basis.”

In a statement, South Antrim MLA Jim Wilson said: “We are greatly concerned that North South Bodies have gone into mission creep. Internal and external issues were supposed to exist as mutually dependent entities. If the Assembly falls, the North South element should also fall. But regrettably this has not been the case.

“Not only are the organisations formalised under the Belfast Agreement operating beyond a care and maintenance basis, but a substantial sub-strata of north-southery has evolved which is entirely independent and unreflective of the wishes of the people of Northern Ireland.

“Jeff Rooker in the House of Lords last July in reply to Lord Kilclooney, said: “If the noble Lord is concerned about discussions between the United Kingdom government and the government of the Republic, he will be more worried after 24th November because discussions will deepen.”

“That’s why the Ulster Unionist Party has created North South Watch. This gradual expansion of North Southery must be highlighted and challenged.”

“We will not allow the rights of the people of Northern Ireland, according to international norms, to be set aside by any government.”

“Ulster Unionists will be keeping a close eye on North South developments in the coming weeks. We will not take our eye off the ball on this issue.”

Visit our new North/South Watch section