“True Principles of Unionism under Threat” - Platform Piece by John Andrews

At long last, after 35 years of assorted negotiations, we have a government with local Ministers representing us at all levels. We must congratulate Dr Paisley on taking the brave and unexpected step to a new era of co-operation in politics. In many respects the St Andrew’s Agreement is indistinguishable from the 1998 original so heavily lambasted by the DUP. He may claim it’s a better and fairer deal—I’m not so sure.

The DUP are purporting that all is rosy for Unionism. The reality is that while the Dr Paisley may seem to have skilfully led the DUP into a deal with which it is not naturally comfortable, he has also taken unionism into a strategic cul-de-sac in which the room for manoeuvre is extremely limited.

Peter Hain’s very personal and very draconian form of direct rule brought political blackmail to the level of an art form, with its threats of increased domestic and industrial rates and the removal of academic selection. Water rates bills were ready to be posted, seven super councils (supported by Sinn Fein) were pending, along with tighter planning rules and tighter funding in all areas. The sole object of this blackmail was to “persuade” the DUP into Government with Sinn Fein. The very fact that the tactic worked, showed just how little influence the DUP could exert; and it also demonstrated the weakened state of the Union itself.

We now have an added threat posed by the rise of nationalism in Scotland and Wales. Dr Paisley seems remarkably comfortable with the leaders of nationalist movements across the United Kingdom and Ireland. He is also comfortable with his own version of little-Ulster nationalism, happier to promote the “ourselves alone” version of unionism rather than an overarching pan-UK unionism.

It all begs the question why could we not have had power sharing 33 years ago with constitutional nationalists, a question Dr Paisley has yet to answer? It was Paisley himself who fanned the flames on numerous occasions, encouraging increased divisions and sectarianism. Bigotry remains endemic in Northern Ireland due to a process of polarisation of politics practiced by both the DUP and Sinn Fein for their own party political ends. Hardly surprising, I suppose, that they are now top dogs in their own packs and able to bark their supposed triumphs to their own followers. They may have done well from the spoils of office; sadly though, the same is not true for the province as a whole.

And what happened to the financial package promised by the tough, “no push-over” DUP? Newly appointed Finance Minister, Peter Robinson, is preparing a budget that will impose cuts across most departments and put many projects on the back-burner.The DUP’s relative failure to obtain a substantial financial package linked to the return of devolution highlights their impotence when faced with the political clout of the Sovereign government.

But times change, that’s politics, and we must move on,we in UUP welcome the DUP’s conversion to real politics. In their ministerial roles we see them working the system ,let’s hope that with no extra money available they can make the departmental efficiency savings necessary to release funds to other priority areas.

Meanwhile,the UUP’s new objectives clause includes the objective to promote and strengthen the Union. It is vital we ensure that the fundamental principles and philosophy of Unionism are not threatened further. We fought successfully for parity with equal rights as equal citizens in the United Kingdom. We will continue to press for a Royal Commission into the future of the Union, for above all else we must participate and contribute to the Union and gain and build friendships within and throughout the United Kingdom.

Continue Reading E-mail October 26th, 2007 John Andrews