Author Archive

Draft budget fails to prioritise private sector growth - Laird

Thursday, July 6th, 2006

During yesterday’s Northern Ireland draft budget debate in the House of Lords, UUP Peer Lord Laird has voiced concerns over the comparatively low priority given to stimulating private sector growth, warning that some of the initiatives of this Budget could create further layers of costly administration.

Addressing the Upper House, the UUP Peer said: “Northern Ireland needs to create more wealth and grow the overall tax-take if it is to reduce the overall subvention, currently running at about £6 billion per year. The draft Budget gives no indication that this has been considered.

“Indeed, the priorities that will help creation and the growth of the private sector have not yet been given the priority they deserve. The draft Budget is too expenditure focused and no significant thought appears to have been given any to the consequences of the Budget on the potential increase of the overall tax revenue.”

Lord Laird warned that Invest NI had significant liabilities to contend with over the next few years. And yet, with DETI’s revenue reduced by £36 million over three years, the budget “provides little scope to support new projects if they arise”, he said.

With a £138 million (18%) rise in administrative costs in the five years up to 2008, the UUP Peer went on to call on the Government to be “a little more ambitious” in reducing cost burdens.

Lord Laird also called for “more significant funding” to be made available for Northern Ireland Railways (NIR), and urged replacement of the remainder of the old fleet as quickly as possible.

Paying tribute to NIR staff and management, he said that the impact of the 23 new trains had been a “tremendous success”.

“Northern Ireland Railways has demonstrated major successes already with these new trains and needs to replace the remainder of the fleet as quickly as possible. I believe that the further 20 plus trains could deliver the 60 per cent growth targets in the regional transportation strategy 2002-12. As a matter of urgency, I would ask Her Majesty’s Government to look at an indicative funding requirement of around £100 million over the years 2008-11,” the UUP Peer said.

Having been set a target of 60% over 10 years, to reach half its targets with the new trains inside 18 months is a tremendous achievement, he added.

“Time for Home Truths for Hain” - Lord Laird

Monday, January 30th, 2006


‘I do not like the tone of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, the Rt Hon Peter Hain MP, when he implies that it is Northern Ireland’s fault that it needs subvention from the central Government. This is the virtue of being in the United Kingdom – wealthy areas help less well off ones to get on their feet again after after a bad experience. That is what we are trying to do locally’.

‘I have gathered together a team of experts – the purpose of this is to produce a document that demonstrates the virtues of being a member of the UK, using West Wales and the Valleys as an example,’ said Lord Laird.

‘Mr Hain’s constituency, Neath, is part of this region which, like Northern Ireland, has been through a difficult time over the last three decades’.

‘There has been massive unemployment following the collapse of the coal and steel industries and the area currently receives around £600 million of subsidies. I don’t begrudge them a single penny of this, but it’s a bit rich when Peter Hain infers that people in Northern Ireland are spongers because we receive a similar amount each year’.

Lord Laird continued: ‘In the early part of the 20th century, when Northern Ireland was a lot more prosperous, we paid more than our fair share into the Exchequer. Now we need a bit of help – you don’t just throw somebody out of the family just because they suddenly can’t pay their way. In fact, there are only about two areas of the UK that currently pay for themselves’.

‘Hopefully, Mr Hain will bear all this in mind and any other interesting facts we uncover about West Wales and the Valleys before he implies we are not paying our way’.

Lord Laird introduces a Bill to remove religious discrimination from Police Recruitment

Sunday, January 15th, 2006



A Private Member’s Bill to remove religious discrimination from the recruitment to the Police Service of Northern Ireland will be introduced into the House of Lords today (Monday 16th January) by the Lord Laird of Artigarvan. Entitled ‘Police (Northern Ireland) Bill [HL]’, it seeks to remove the current 50/50 recruitment requirement between Roman Catholics and non-Roman Catholics.

Explaining his action, Lord Laird said that the 50/50 rule which has been in place for the past four years has discriminated against both Roman Catholics and non-Roman Catholics. “Most recruitment campaigns were unfair to non-Roman Catholics, but at least one discriminated against Roman Catholics. The religion of an applicant is not the issue. If he or she is qualified for the job, he or she should get it. To do anything else is to diminish people’s human rights”, said Lord Laird.

“How can an organisation designed to uphold the law have its recruitment based on an infringement of long-accepted human rights principles. I know very many well-qualified young people who are totally disillusioned by their being refused entry to the PSNI only because they were the wrong religion”.

“Over and above the human rights issue, 50/50 recruitment has not been very successful. The number of female recruits has increased without reverse discrimination and instead by targeting that area. So if society wants, rightly, to increase the number of Roman Catholics in the police, why does the same approach not work in that case?”

“It is interesting to note that such legislation as the original Act to allow for 50/50 recruitment could never have been passed by the Unionist government at Stormont. The Northern Ireland Parliament was governed by the Government of Ireland Act 1920, which meant that any action which discriminated against anyone or any organisation on the ground of religion was null and void. To get the Bill onto the Northern Ireland Statute Book in 1998, the Government of Ireland Act had to be repealed”.

“I have been interested in testing the 50/50 rule in the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg and would still hope to do so. The correct circumstances have not yet become available. I would like anyone who feels that they were financially disadvantaged by 50/50 to write to me at the Lords in London”.

“Fifty/fifty has been a blight on society in Northern Ireland. I hope this Bill will be supported and the blight removed”, concluded Lord Laird.