Author Archive

McGimpsey welcomes DUPs cosmetic tweaks to the Agreement as sign that they are finally embracing Positive Change

Wednesday, August 30th, 2006

UUP South Belfast MLA Michael McGimpsey today welcomed the fact that the DUP are embracing positive change by seeking cosmetic tweaks to the Belfast Agreement.

Mr McGimpsey, responding to today’s article in the Newsletter in which the DUP claimed they had made significant changes to the Agreement, welcomed the engagement from the DUP and said it was a long overdue recognition by them of the progress that Northern Ireland had made over the last 10 years.

In a statement the UUP MLA said,

“Bar a few cosmetic tweaks here and there to the agreement, the deal being offered by the DUP is essentially the Belfast Agreement.

It is useful to think of these ‘changes’ as similar to the changes you would make to a modified car. Under the hood it is still the same car. But the bodywork has been changed with a few go faster stripes and a spoiler. In the end it still does the same things as the car without the modifications and ultimately will drive you to the same destination.

With direct rule ministers continuing to negatively affect the daily lives of everyone in Northern Ireland with policies that do not command the support of the public, it is refreshing to see that the DUP have woken up, ditched the negative messages of the last few weeks and are beginning to embrace positive change.

Ultimately they will have to present the people to whom they promised so much with what effectively is a slightly modified Belfast Agreement. This obviously requires a lot of ground work and I welcome their opening move on this front.

I welcome and congratulate the DUP on this positive development. It will be seen as an act of significant engagement. It has been a long hard slog, but finally after a number of years in the wilderness the DUP are finally embracing positive change.”

McGimpsey urges Irish Rugby bosses to use common sense on choice of Anthem in Belfast

Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006

UUP South Belfast MLA and former sports minister Michael McGimpsey today urged Irish Rugby bosses to use their common sense when it comes to deciding what national Anthem to play when the Irish rugby team play International games in Belfast.

There had been some debate in recent days about what anthems should be played and when.

In a statement Mr McGimpsey said,

“I would urge Irish Rugby bosses to use their common sense when it comes to deciding what anthems should be played at different venues.

The Soldiers song is played at International games in Dublin and Ireland’s Call is played at all international ‘away’ fixtures. On the rare occasions that international fixtures are played in Belfast it must be ‘God Save the Queen’.

The Irish Rugby team is an all-Ireland team with players from across Northern Ireland. It is only right and proper therefore that for international fixtures in Belfast our national anthem is played. When the Irish team plays in Belfast they are playing at home, in Belfast the home anthem is God Save the Queen. It really is that simple.”

Maze Project ‘Tainted’ - McGimpsey

Friday, August 18th, 2006

Senior Ulster Unionist and former Sports Minister Michael McGimpsey has said that the hunger strike museum is clearly the price the DUP will have to pay to get the Maze project on track.

In a statement, the South Belfast MLA said: “The cat’s out of the bag. All my predictions have come true, and the DUP can’t say they haven’t been warned.

“The DUP says ‘republican shrine not on at the Maze’ – they say they will not allow Sinn Fein to build a shrine. It’s too late, it’s already there.

“There’s no point in anyone saying that this will not be a shrine. Republicans are treating it as such – they’ve already had one commemoration on it, so what’s to stop them doing it again?

“On Tuesday, the DUP came out against the ‘politicisation’ of sport at Casement Park. But by Wednesday it emerges that republicans want to see Maze prison walls, watchtowers and H-blocks preserved along with the hospital where 10 hunger strikers died.”

“The DUP have been far from consistent on the issue.

  • On May 12, responding to concerns that the Maze site will contain a republican shrine, the DUP chairman of the Maze Panel Edwin Poots reportedly said “it is largely accepted now that this will not happen. Republicans conceded the museum idea was a non-runner some time ago… I am confident there will be no shrine”.
  • Then on May 31, Coiste spokesman and former hunger striker Laurence McKeown, is reported to have said that “the suggestion for a conflict transformation centre was actually made by Coiste so we are certainly very supportive of the announcement”.
  • On the same day, Edwin Poots had moved from no shrine, to defining what the buildings would be. “I would dismiss any notion of this being a terrorist shrine or anything like that”, he said.
  • And by June 5, Mr Poots had wobbled again, conceding there would be a building but that he didn’t think the centre would glorify terrorism. “It will actually point out the deficiencies in terrorism and send out a clear message that people should move away from terrorism and conflict.”
  • And now republicans announce plans for a £10 million museum and conflict resolution centre to be built on the site of the former Maze prison.”

Mr McGimpsey added: “On June 5, the DUP had maneuvered themselves into a position where they actually ended up arguing the merits for the ‘hunger strike museum’.

“Are they really going to hide behind semantics and argue the difference between shrine, transformation centre, and museum?

“What republicans did at Casement last weekend has profoundly embarrassed the GAA. They hijacked an important cultural and sporting venue for their own ends. If anyone really thinks that they won’t do this at the Maze, they’ll need their head examined.”

Northern Ireland Arts should not be Short-Changed - McGimpsey

Thursday, August 17th, 2006

UUP Former Arts Minister Michael McGimpsey has criticised the Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure for providing the Arts Council Northern Ireland with an inadequate budget, marking Northern Ireland as one of the lowest spenders on the arts in the UK.

According to a recent report by the Arts Council Northern Ireland, an average £6.33 per person is spent per person on the arts, followed by England at £8.19, Wales at £8.80, Scotland at £10.69 and the republic of Ireland £10.72.

The UUP spokesman for Culture, Arts and Leisure said:

“The arts in Northern Ireland are being severely short changed when we consider the budgets allocated elsewhere in the UK. Whilst places like Edinburgh are receiving cash injections for arts projects right, left and centre, Northern Ireland is falling behind and in danger of losing out.

“During my time as Arts Minister, I doubled the funding for the arts. However, with Direct Rule, we are sliding behind whilst others areas have witnessed substantial increases. The government has clearly not shown the same commitment to Northern Ireland as it has shown elsewhere.

“Money spent on the arts is money well spent. Not only do the Arts reinforce our cultural creativity, it captures the imagination of our public and excites the interest of our young people.

“Simply put, we cannot allow the artistic needs of Northern Ireland to fall under the wayside, and under Direct Rule, attention to the arts has continued to slip. This is another example of how Northern Ireland’s future would be best in the hands of locally elected representatives who are sincere in their promotion of Northern Ireland’s rich artistic and cultural endeavors”.

“No more Sham IRA Inquiries - Republicans must reveal information on remaining Disappeared” - McGimpsey

Tuesday, July 11th, 2006

Following the IRA’s ‘thorough investigation’ into Jean McConville, senior Ulster Unionist Michael McGimpsey has said that the only ‘inquiry’ of value is one which reveals the burial locations of the remaining Disappeared.

In a statement, the South Belfast MLA said: “The IRA would have us believe that it can launch an inquiry into events more than three decades old. If they can do that, then they can investigate the ‘Disappeared’.

“People here are not interested in attempts by republicans at self-justification. We’ve seen how this veers from sham inquiries by the IRA to shameful interviews by apologists declaring that the murder of Jean McConville simply wasn’t a crime.

“Instead of releasing baseless accusations and excuses, republicans should inquire over the Disappeared and reveal meaningful information on burial sites.”

He added: “Clearly, the IRA is solely concerned with repeating old lies, rather than offering some crumb of comfort to victims families who have been denied the opportunity to bury their loved ones for so long.

“Sham IRA inquiries are, of course, valueless. A more valuable exercise would be for republicans to alleviate, rather than accentuate, the suffering of these families.”

UUP in positive meeting with Hanson on redevelopment projects for South of the City

Wednesday, July 5th, 2006

South Belfast MLA Michael McGimpsey led a delegation including UUP Cllr Bob Stoker, Tom Morrow from the Greater Village Regeneration Trust (GVRT) and representatives for Annadale Residents for a meeting with Minister David Hanson today.

The delegation, while welcoming recent government initiatives said it had concerns at the pace of change and wanted to ensure minimal foot dragging from government on their proposals and undertakings regarding the re-development of the Donegall Road/Village and Annadale areas.

Speaking after the meeting Mr McGimpsey said,

“We had a very constructive meeting with Minister Hanson. We discussed the upcoming redevelopment of the Donegall Road/Village area. This area has the highest concentration of unfit housing in Northern Ireland – of 1400 units 2/3 are designated unfit. The GVRT, Cllr Stoker and Myself are concerned at the slow pace of change since the redevelopment announcement was made. The plans will have a strong and positive effect on the local community but people are telling us that they want to see real action on the ground and not just words of intent. We wanted to ensure that there was no foot dragging and that the process could get underway as quickly as possible. Minister Hanson said he would be writing to me shortly with a detailed timeframe for the redevelopment process. This is a welcome development.”

Turning to the redevelopment of Annadale Mr McGimpsey added,

“The re-development of Annadale is another very welcome government initiative but again I remain concerned at the pace of change. The Housing Executive has pledged £8 Million to the redevelopment of the flats and a minimum of 50 homes for Annadale Crescent. We want to see the process beginning as soon as possible and the lives of the many residents who will be affected improving quickly.”

McGimpsey comments on launch of HMO subject plan

Wednesday, June 28th, 2006

Commenting following his meeting with Planning Minister David Cairns yesterday morning, and the launch of the Belfast Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) Subject Plan, UUP South Belfast MLA Michael McGimpsey said:

“I welcome the launch of the strategy. Putting proper controls and policy in place to deal with unscrupulous landlords is something that I have been campaigning for, alongside others, for a number of years now.

“This strategy ought to provide a measure of control and discipline in the area of HMO development. There’s a draft policy in place – let’s see the Planning Department and Planning Appeals Commission use this to protect the quality of life of families in South Belfast in particular, and for those further afield.

“The local community should not be prey to landlords whose sole motivation is profit. Instead of councillors being forced to suspend HMO applications on a case-by-case basis, the safeguards must be there to ensure inner city areas are not swamped with haphazard development. And that’s what the HMO Subject Plan ought to be about.

“The real solution for an area like the Holylands is for Queen’s University to produce purpose-built accommodation so that the local community is protected and the student body is not exploited.”

McGimpsey highlights problems associated with HMOs

Tuesday, June 27th, 2006

Ulster Unionist South Belfast assembly member, Michael McGimpsey, will meet with Planning Minister David Cairns on Tuesday to highlight the problems associated with “unscrupulous developers” and the proliferation of Houses Multiple Occupancy (HMOs) which includes flat conversions.

The South Belfast MLA will call for:

- a cap to be placed on the numbers of HMOs in residential areas

- an effective moratorium on new HMO development in the Holylands

- and proper controls and policy in place to allow planners to clampdown on unscrupulous developers.

In a statement, the South Belfast MLA said: “According to the Housing Executive’s recent ‘South Belfast Housing Study’ there are more than 10,000 HMOs in Northern Ireland, half of which [4,806 properties] are in South Belfast alone. Clearly, HMO development and flat conversions is smothering communities in South Belfast.

“The Belfast Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) Subject Plan is due for publication on Tuesday. Assuming it comes back with appropriate controls, I will be calling for a Ministerial statement pledging to immediately adopt it as policy.

“Jeff Rooker produced a Ministerial statement for rural planning. While the PPS 14 document was out for consultation, it was treated as policy. Urban development should be approached in the same way. If they can protect the countryside from rural bungalows, they can protect South Belfast from unscrupulous developers.

“Therefore, I will be calling on the Minister to give immediate effect to safeguards and controls contained within the HMO Subject Plan. If these are immediately adopted it will guillotine applications – and avoid the inevitable rush from developers over the coming months.”

He added: “Newly proposed HMO applications must be banished from the Holylands. Indeed, in all areas of South Belfast there must be a cap placed on HMOs and flat conversions allowed in the area.

“For example, in Glasgow there is a 10% cap on HMO development placed around the university area. There needs to be a similar approach for Queen’s University – a 10% cap must be the absolute maximum.

“We need to put proper controls and policy in place to allow the Planning Department to deal with unscrupulous and profiteering landlords. But in particular we need to bring the Planning Appeals Commission into line.

“What has happened in the Holyands could not have happened without the lax approach of the Planning Appeals Commission. This is unacceptable in a public body.”

Concluding he said: “Just to get an idea of where all this could be heading - one landlord remarked that there should be no residents in Holylands, that it should be exclusive to HMO development.

“I think that’s an outrageous suggestion for anyone to make. But this indicates that landlords and developers are now sufficiently emboldened to now be opening talking in this way.

“The Planning Minister should now immediately send out the clear message that South Belfast communities will be protected. Their quality of life must be given primacy in the decision-making process.

“The trend over HMOs must be stopped in South Belfast. Communities should not be smothered by haphazard and unregulated development.”

Time for a separate City Centre Policing Unit - McGimpsey

Thursday, June 22nd, 2006

At the moment Belfast is divided up into four different policing sections, known as District Command Units: North, South, East and West with each area allocated a full-time quota of around 250 police officers. So far, so reasonable.

However in the South Belfast DCU the City Centre is added in. This creates a clear discrepancy when compared to other parts of the City. Looking at the most recent figures for total offences recorded in each DCU for 2005-2006 we can see that North Belfast has 8,637 offences recorded, East Belfast has 5,372, West Belfast 6,625 and South Belfast has 13,080.

Over the past two years South Belfast has registered almost double the crimes than any other part of the city. These figures reveal much about the unique conditions which exist within the area.

The City Centre, with all of its shops, pubs and restaurants is naturally busy. With so many people concentrated in a relatively small area the crime figures will of course be higher.

In other parts of the United Kingdom the demands of policing the commercial centres and nightspots require a separate approach. There have been numerous television programmes dedicated to police activities at the weekend in cities like Newcastle and Nottingham. Look at what happens in the capital: London operates a Metropolitan, a city of London and a Transport Police service. While Belfast and London are of course not comparable in terms of size, the London example is indicative of how to approach policing in urban centres.

I believe it is time for the city centre to have its own dedicated DCU with its own manpower, so as to avoid resources being severely overstretched in other parts of South Belfast. We have the same number of police officers in South Belfast as in other parts of the city but they are effectively doing double the workload. The demands of city centre policing are bleeding the rest of South Belfast of a proper and meaningful police presence. The people in this part of the city are being neglected.

The city centre is by no means the only drain on resources in the area. 10% of the 250 quota is earmarked to patrol the Holylands. So at times, particularly weekends, South Belfast as a whole is severely undermanned as officers are re-deployed to cope with city centre incidents.

There is no reason why the PSNI should not create a dedicated command unit targeted specifically to operating within the commercial and retail heartland of our capital. This would ensure the best possible policing option for the city, and south Belfast residents.

Last week the PSNI started a recruitment drive for part time officers. While this is to be welcomed, it is nonetheless a drop in the ocean for south Belfast. It just won’t begin to deal with the problems of the area

Policing is about upholding the rule of law and protecting life and property. Forming a separate city unit would be a tremendous reassurance to both South Belfast residents and the business sector. It would also send out a very clear message out to organised crime gangs and individual criminals. I would call on other parties, particularly Sinn Fein whose ambiguous attitude towards law and order still prevails, to put their money where their mouth is and back my call.

Sunday Life Platform Piece on the National Stadium - Michael McGimpsey MLA

Wednesday, June 14th, 2006

The government is intent on pushing the Maze project ahead. We’re told there’s no plan B.

This is an issue that cannot be got wrong. Let’s examine the key questions. Is the location right? Are the finances right? Are the aims and intentions right?

Launching the Maze blueprint, David Hanson argued that the Maze site could see security installations turned into “symbols” of renewal and growth.

This is very similar to what Tony Blair said during a visit to Belfast four years ago.

Announcing plans to hand over installations to the public in 2002, the Prime Minister said there was a “great symbolic importance” in handing over assets from the “bad old days”.

Symbolism is a driving principle behind the Maze. But symbolism is not a decisive argument for committing hundreds of millions of pounds from the public purse to a landmark development.

Labour did that once before – and the result was the Millennium Dome.

And what of the H-Block hospital building that forms part of the package – now dubbed the ‘Conflict Transformation Centre’?

David Hanson says that preserving what many view as a shrine to republican terrorists will promote “learning… internationally about our experience here of the move from conflict into peace”.

And DUP MLA Edwin Poots has said that the centre highlights the “deficiencies in terrorism and send(s) out a clear message that people should move away from terrorism and conflict”.

Anyone who saw republicans gathering at the site last month would not have seen ‘deficiencies in terrorism’ exposed, they will have seen the activities of terrorists venerated.

Politics and symbolism are at the heart of government decision-making. It certainly isn’t based on financial considerations. How could it be? We still haven’t seen a business plan.

Big-ticket, multi-sport venues look good on paper. More so when the big idea is to design and deliver it for an Olympics or World Cup.

But the journey to delivery crosses white elephant territory. The experience of Japan and Italy post-World Cup, and Sydney and Athens post-Olympics, shows this.

The question of how a national stadium secures revenue streams after the Games needs to be satisfactorily resolved.

But no one has explained how a site at the Maze will consistently fill 42,000 seats year-on-year after the Olympics. Yet £7.4 million of public money will now go towards an appraisal of the project.

Overall, the estimated cost of the Maze project has risen from £85 million to £400 million. How many more increases are on the horizon? Are we not in danger of bequeathing a flash-in-the-pan money pit to taxpayers of the future?

Location is vitally important.

Architect Rod Sheard, who worked with Sir Norman Foster on the Wembley Stadium, said recently that one of the big changes in city planning is the importance of locating sports stadia in city centres.

NITB chief executive Alan Clarke said that “infrastructure in central Belfast is capable of supporting the likely footfall of a new stadium and will therefore realise the project’s full economic and tourism potential”.

The Belfast Chamber of Trade and Commerce said that “international experience” has shown that stadia work best when they are served by the necessary social and physical infrastructure.

When considered in those terms, the Maze is not Northern Ireland’s top location. How on earth can there be no alternative site for the national stadium?

Recently one acre of land in Coleraine topped £1.5 million at auction. There are 360 acres of land lying vacant at the Maze site. How on earth can there be no alternative plan for the Maze?

In 2002, the Prime Minister said installations were being “handed over to the Northern Ireland Executive” – or in other words, the people of Northern Ireland. In practice, the Whitehall wing of the Labour Government has handed these installations over to the NIO wing of the Labour Government.

Direct Rulers have driven this forward – the people of Northern Ireland have not. And when bad politics overrules sound economics, the taxpayer pays the price.